from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2OzZvvP
Friday, 22 November 2019
A Good Cause
From a friend's daughter:
"Hi, I'm Vanessa Leahr and I live with multiple chronic health conditions including a connective tissue disorder called Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Gastroparesis, and more.
I recently started an online shop called DAZZLING THEM: DESIGNS BY VANESSA L. as a creative way to make money to help pay for my medical expenses and raise awareness for my conditions.
Please check out my shop, and share this link with friends and family to help me grow my business."
Please check out my shop, and share this link with friends and family to help me grow my business."
On Vanessa's behalf, thank you for taking the time to read this message, and I hope it piques your interest.
from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3370edn
Thursday, 21 November 2019
And speaking of #Medicaid4All
Britain's Much Vaunted National Health Service© continues o cover itself in .... glory (for certain values of "glory"):
But hey: Free!
Or left in hallways to die. https://t.co/LJvZpXKyIg— Beau Geste (@BeauGeste11) November 21, 2019
But hey: Free!
from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2KHXXP8
Wednesday, 20 November 2019
Why MLR is such a joke
It's been a while since we last visited MLR (Medical Loss Ratio):
"In case you didn't know, the ACA requires carriers to pay out (at least) 80% of premiums collected in claims. For large groups, that requirement is 85%. Anything less and they have to send the difference to their insureds."
The idea was to encourage (require) carriers to be more carful stewards of the premiums they receive and their obligation to pay out as much of those in claims as possible.
Anyone else see the glaring logical fallacy here?
Well, FoIB Ed Swan sure did:
#PieceOfThePie
"In case you didn't know, the ACA requires carriers to pay out (at least) 80% of premiums collected in claims. For large groups, that requirement is 85%. Anything less and they have to send the difference to their insureds."
The idea was to encourage (require) carriers to be more carful stewards of the premiums they receive and their obligation to pay out as much of those in claims as possible.
Anyone else see the glaring logical fallacy here?
Well, FoIB Ed Swan sure did:
Understanding MLR.— Ed Swann (@Epic_Ed) November 8, 2019
15% of a higher number is...a higher number. This is why insurance carriers have no incentive to negotiate lower prices for healthcare services. They just pass the costs back to the insured in the form of higher premiums. https://t.co/dDEcS9fa4E
#PieceOfThePie
from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2O6Om6A
Tuesday, 19 November 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)