Breaking: *Full* COVID-19 coverage

This is HUGE - Humana waiving all CV-19 costs, treatment included:

"[C]osts related to subsequent treatment for COVID-19—including inpatient hospital admissions— will be waived for enrollees of Medicare Advantage plans, fully insured commercial members, Medicare Supplement and Medicaid.The waiver applies to all medical costs related to the treatment of COVID-19 as well as FDA-approved medications or vaccines when they become available."

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2w39Gnr

CV-19 & Labels

Well, off-label, actually:

I've been asked how carriers might handle the off-label use of meds like Chloroquine (generally used as an anti-malarial drug, and also for lupus) . That is, would this "off-label use" still be considered a valid/covered expense?

To that end, I've reached out to one of our carriers (and been trying to do so with others) to see how this issue has historically been addressed. By way of example, I've posed this:

"Researching a post on how carriers *might* handle use of chloroquine for COVID-19. NOT asking how y'all will handle that issue specifically, but just how/if cover off-label use of meds for medically-necessary issues. For example, using Colchicine (gout med) for Pericarditis (pericardium inflammation). *In general*, is this kind of thing usually covered?"

As one might imagine, carriers are (understandably) reluctant to pre-adjudicate a hypothetical claim, and so I've been very carefiul to emphasize that I'm looking only for a historical perspective, which may be of value in the current situation.

So far, I've been kicked up the food chain, but still awaiting an on-point response.

If you are in a position (or know someone who is) to help us with an answer, I would be very grateful for your help. And, of course, confidentiality is a given.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2JtHJZ3

COVID, Fraud and You

From our friends at the Ohio Insurance Agents association:

"Phishing emails are a great way for hackers to gain access to your system. Phishing is a cyber-crime term that describes how criminals pose as legitimate institutions or a trustworthy entity/individual to trick you into providing sensitive data such as login ID’s and passwords.

Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, cyber-criminals are using fear and uncertainty to prompt people to click on emails that promise supplies of paper products, hand sanitizer, and other products that are in short supply. Some reports are indicating that consumers are giving credit card information thinking they are buying supplies for their household.  Phishing doesn’t come in just the form of emails; you need to be aware that phishing can happen via text and phone calls as well."

So what can you do?

Well, for one thing, always check the return address on these emails, they'll often (usually?) be an obvious fake. And before clicking any links, check with your (or your company's) IT folks for verification.

Be careful out there!!

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2QTV0OP

CV-19 vs P&C: Grace Period Update

A few days ago, we mentioned that (at least) one of our carriers was offering to "adjust the customer’s current bill and to waive any late fees for any premium payments due between March 16 and April 30."

Well that was then, and this is now, and it's no longer just a nice gesture on the carriers' part. Our friends at the Ohio Insurance Agents association just tipped us:

"This bulletin pertains to all insurers (“Insurers”) providing property and casualty, life, and long term care insurance policies (“policies”) in the State of Ohio. The purpose of this bulletin is to notify Insurers that they must provide their insureds with at least a 60-day grace period to pay insurance premiums or submit information."

As with the similar decree about group insurance (and from the Feds on ObamaPlans), it's critical to keep in mind that this is a deferral, not a waiver: at some point the bill will come due. So think long and hard about your financial status now vs early summer.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2Us3m2k

OSHA vs HIPAA

Got this from our primary P&C carrier:

"Employers must report COVID-19 illness in workplace."

Which makes sense, but (as I pointed out at that post) seems to contradict HIPAA/privacy requirements, as well as guidance we noted the other day:

"Applicable law limits Anthem’s ability to share an individual’s protected health information with an employer absent an authorization or certain extenuating circumstances. As a result, Anthem is limited by law in its ability to disclose individual’s protected health information to an employer."

So how to square that circle?

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2wNdHwK

Business Interruption vs CV-19: Revisited

This is what I love (and hate) about the insurance biz: to paraphrase a former POTUS, it depends on what the meaning of "covered loss" is.

Hunh?

Well, last week we posted what we thought was the definitive answer to the question of whether one's Business Interruption coverage would be triggered by the current Pandemic:

"In the event of my absence, if anyone for commercial lines calls and asks if there is any business income coverage due to their business shutting down during the Coronavirus outbreak, the answer is "No"."

And that, it seemed (at the time, at least) was that.

But maybe not:

"By way of example, some policies require “direct physical loss of or damage to” property. “Loss” and “damage” are not synonymous and may require separate analysis. Such wording could arguably trigger coverage where there is a loss of the premise’s use (even if the property is not physically damaged)."

That is, maybe BI cover does extend, even absent a "direct, physical loss."

The article notes, for example that if "a property has been contaminated by an infected person, or because COVID-19 is in the airspace or on surfaces, this will likely constitute direct physical damage." I would argue that this alone doesn't seem to reach the threshold, but then, I'm not the judge or the claims adjustor.

And, of course, that particular cite pertained to a New Jersey Appellate Court decision, so its relevance in other jurisdictions is up for grabs.

And there's this:

"Depending on the circumstances, the governing law, and the applicable policy’s language, they may very well be wrong. By way of example, some policies require “direct physical loss of or damage to” property. “Loss” and “damage” are not synonymous and may require separate analysis."

Will be interesting to see how this shakes out.

As always, consult with your own agent about how your policy may (or may not) handle this.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2xt9jmF

And now for something completely different (and cute!)

Because we could all use a smile 'bout now:

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2UB2PtP

Breaking: CV-19 & ObamaPlans

That is, premium deferment options similar to what we're seeing in the group market:

(CMS) posted Payment &; Grace Period Flexibilities Issuers Offering Coverage FFM & SBE, CMS will exercise enforcement discretion to permit issuers lans (QHPs) & (SADPs) to extend payment deadlines for initial payments as well as ongoing premiums during the period of the COVID-19

— HAFA (@TheNolanGroup) March 25, 2020

The key is that the Feds seem to be allowing such flexibility, not requiring it. And, as we've noted with the group extended grace period offer, these premiums are *deferred*, not waived; that is, the piper will eventually have to be paid.

Be careful...


Full text of notice here.

Updates shortly.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/39lxdO6

LTCi: When to make a claim

Courtesy of co-blogger Mike:

During a visit to my doctor, I asked him, "How do you determine whether or not an older person is ready to make a Long Term Care claim for Assisted Living?"

"Well," he said, "we fill up a bathtub, then we offer a teaspoon, a teacup and a bucket to the person to empty the bathtub."

"Oh, I understand," I said. "A normal person would use the bucket because it is bigger than the spoon or the teacup."

"No" he said. "A normal person would pull the plug. Here’s your claim form."

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/33LU6cv

Retiring Age 65 With Younger Spouse - Medicare COBRA Trap

Planning to retire? You are Medicare age but your spouse is not. What are your options?

Age 65 Younger Spouse

You MAY continue to work if that is available.



You can enroll with Medicare, your spouse opts for an #Obamacare plan.



Or you take Medicare and spouse chooses COBRA.



Just don't pick COBRA for BOTH of you. That triggers the Medicare COBRA trap.



<iframe width="480" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pfrRpDeVYuE?clip=

#Medicare #YoungerSpouse #COBRA

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2QHyZm1

From the P&C Files: More CV-19 News

I think we've had more P&C-related posts the past week or so than the past year combined. But it is Insureblog, so...

■ From Cincinnati Insurance Company (and, I'm sure, we'll see other carriers following suit):

"Billing

Policyholders are understandably concerned about their ability to pay premiums as government mandated closures continue to increase. To help, we’re suspending all property casualty cancellations due to nonpayment from March 16 to April 30 – or later if required by an individual state.

While we hope that most policyholders can stick with their current payment arrangements, if you have a standard lines commercial, personal or life policyholder asking about alternative payment arrangements our billing associates are authorized to adjust the customer’s current bill and to waive any late fees for any premium payments due between March 16 and April 30. This is not a waiver of payments during the suspension period, but an extension or grace period for those directly impacted by this pandemic. Please have them contact our billing departments"

■ We've discussed Special Event coverage before:

"World Furniture Mall "promised that if the Bears shut out the Packers in the season opener at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, Labor Day weekend shoppers would get their furniture free."

And of course there's so-called 'Hole-in-one' cover and the like, as well.

Typically, these cover unforeseen issues like weather or the like, but what about the current situation? Well, our friends at the Ohio Insurance Agents association offer this heads' up:

"Read the policy language. Every policy is different. Prepare yourself by reading the policy language and specific exclusions on the Special Event Policies that you have issued. In addition, contact your underwriters for clarification on the exclusions to ensure you have a thorough understanding and will be able to communicate it back to your clients."

Always good advice.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2Uw15C8

What could go wrong?

Let's say that you deliberately skipped Open Enrollment (because, hey, why not?). And let's say that you now regret that decision.

No problem, mi amigo:

"Eleven States Now Letting Uninsured Sign Up for Obamacare"

Never let a crisis go to waste.

#Medicaid4All

[Hat Tip: FoIB Holly R]

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3dARNNU

Anthem Update

Just off conference call with Anthem execs, lots of interesting info, and will try to put together a more complete post, but some highlights:

■ Extraordinary focus on "Virtual Care" - what we've been calling 'telehealth' or 'telemedicine' and which has been mostly under the radar, until now. This is as much about capacity as it is social distancing, and the government is requiring carrier (like Anthem) to offer these services with no cost-sharing.

■ Relaxed rules on early refills for maintenance meds - this makes sense, again to minimize travel and maximize social distancing.

■ Group Plan Special Enrollment - This was a surprise to me: employees who initially waived group coverage can actually enroll between now and April 3rd, with full coverage.

There's more, and I'll try to update as quickly as possible. Stray tuned.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2UdXAkT

And speaking of Group Insurance

Last Friday, we posted a breaking news item pertaining to group health insurance plans and grace periods:

"Employers can defer their premium payments for health insurance for up to 2 months."

Now, we have more details:

"Insurers must permit employers to continue covering employees under group policies even if the employee would become ineligible due to a decrease in hours worked ... Employees who lose coverage are eligible for a special enrollment perio to enroll in new [individual] coverage."

More at this link.

One presumes other states will also roll out similar decrees.

Oh!

We also got some interesting info from Anthem, courtesy of FoIB Beth D:

Q: Can Anthem provide my company with information regarding COVID-19 cases within our member population?

A: Applicable law limits Anthem’s ability to share an individual’s protected health information with an employer absent an authorization or certain extenuating circumstances. As a result, Anthem is limited by law in its ability to disclose individual’s protected health information to an employer.

Q: Can an employer receive information on the number of claims — but not specific names — for COVID-19 tests and related services?
 
A: No. Currently, it may be possible to identify someone specifically even if, for example, their name is not shared. We recommend checking in with local health authorities to understand the total number of cases in any given area.

Hadn't even considered the HIPAA/Privacy angles here. Thanks, Anthem (and Beth)!

And one more thing (because I'd been wondering about how this will affect self-insured plans, as well):

Self-insured plans no longer have the option not to waive out-of-pocket member expenses for the diagnostic test and the visit associated with the test, as laid out in the federal mandate.

So there ya go.
 

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3dqXNZh

Underwriting, Selling, and CV-19

We've been discussing some of the insurance issues which agents, companies and clients are facing while the Pandemic continues. Obviously, people still need insurance, and of course a lot of policies are negotiated at the proverbial kitchen table. But what happens when the kitchen table meets 'social distancing?'

Well, our friends at Mutual of Omaha have some suggestions:

"We encourage you to also do your part to slow the spread of the coronavirus. You're likely rethinking how you can keep yourself and others safe in a business that's built on relationships with people and, most often, face-to-face interactions ... We strongly encourage you not to conduct in-person client meetings and we should all be prudent to exercise an abundance of caution."

And they go on to list some reasonable alternatives:

[QUOTE BOX]
o Opt for video meetings or phone calls when possible.
o Avoid in-person meetings if either you or another participant is at risk.

They also suggest contacting folks in advance, and avoid meetings where any of the participants aren't feeling well. And they also suggest - and I think this is particularly helpful - that if one does "proceed with an in-person meeting, please document the client's agreement to meet ... This will be key if there are any questions later regarding meetings or participants."

Or, as our friends at Issue Insurance call it, 'Professional Distancing.'

I like it.

All of these strictures apply, of course, to any insurance sales opportunity, from a simple auto policy renewal to complex Long Term Care insurance reviews.

And remember Sgt Esterhaus' admonition.

 Of course, Professional Distancing just got a lot easier for us folks in the Buckeye State.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3apapy4

Breaking (Group Health Insurance) News: Buckeye State edition

Co-blogger Patrick just sent me this:

.@LtGovHusted: @OHInsurance is issuing an order to allow employers to take care of employees with a grace period for insurance premiums. Employers can defer their premium payments for health insurance for up to 2 months.

— Governor Mike DeWine (@GovMikeDeWine) March 20, 2020

This is relevant to our post the other day wondering about the short term future of group health plans, and is welcome news indeed.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3a6XkJH

More from P&C World: CV-19 update

While we've been focused primarily on the health insurance aspect of the pandemic, we've also blogged petty extensively about Business Interruption coverage in commercial lines packages, and even noted how the P&C side of the biz is likely sheltered from catastrophic losses.

But something I hadn't seen addressed, at least until now, is the Worker's Comp issue:

Michel Leonard of @iiiorg says highest impact will be on Work Comp with exposure highest for carriers covering medical, first responders, transportation and retail. Need for greater education around policies and coverages regarding #COVID19

— National Association of Insurance Commissioners (@naic) March 20, 2020

That is, as more workers succumb to the Chinese Coronavirus while on the job. I can see this; for example:

Had to meet a relative at the ER yesterday, and while she was squadded in, I had to walk to the ER from the parking lot. I was immediately stopped by a very polite yong nurse tech(?) who took and reported my temp and asked a few health questions. Her PPE consisted of a blanket (it was a bit chilly, and the door was propped open) and a pair of latex gloves. And yet, here I waltz in, breathing (and maybe coughing?) and I'm thinking that that blanket and those gloves are no match for CV-19.

#Food4Thought

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/33Bl7Pq

Good news, bad news: CV-19 style

The good news is that, through government action and insurance company efforts, (initial) CV-19 testing is "free" (scare quotes because, well, we all know why).

The bad news, as FoIB Sheron Sidbury notes, is less obvious:

I wonder how many people think their health insurance will pay for Corvid19 treatments. Waving a copay for the test is not the same as waving a fee for your "treatment". HDHP folks you are still on the hook. They ar only waving copays for the test.https://t.co/XHs7skx0F2

— Sheron E Sidbury (@SheronESidbury) March 19, 2020

And it gets worse: pretty much all individual plans, and not a few group ones, are built on an HMO-chassis, which means if the only or closest) treatment facility is out-of-network, you're outta luck.

Ouch.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2xWGaQX

Disability Insurance and CV-19

As we continue to monitor carriers' response to the pandemic, here's some helpful info from our friends at Companion Life (full discourage: CompLife is out go-to carrier for ancillary non-medical group coverage, including short- and long-term disability plans):

"If you have, or have been exposed to, COVID-19 and have been diagnosed by a certified medical professional, you can file a short-term disability claim."

Subject to waiting periods and the like.

Now, we've also been following the Business Interruption coverage issue:

"In the event of my absence, if anyone for commercial lines calls and asks if there is any business income coverage due to their business shutting down during the Coronavirus outbreak, the answer is "No"."

Okay, but what about disability coverage?

Well:

"We understand that some of our groups maybe faced with temporarily closing their doors dure to COVID-19. As an employer, if you choose to deem your employees still "actively emoloyed" and "benefits-eligible" during that temporary closure, Companion Life will recognize those statuses."

This is similar to the Medical Mutual of Ohio stance on group plans.

It's important to note, of course,  that as with the BI issue, absent an actual "physical loss" these folks aren't 'disabled,' so aren't eligible for benefits.

On the other hand, and in keeping with current sentiments currently coming out of DC, the company is "extending the grace period for remitting premium payments."

Kudos.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2U6ZoMx

Speaking of #SurpriseBilling

Out-of-network balance billing has long been a bugaboo of ours; it's part of the whole "transparency in health care" issue we've long since supported. Here, for example:

"Briefly, the issue is that there is essentially a class of providers who, although they may ply their trade inside a network-approved facility, are nonetheless not contracted with a given (or any)."

This has became a burgeoning problem, especially since so many ObamaPlans are now on an HMO chassis (that is, very skinny networks coupled with virtually no out-of-network coverage).

But there may be a light at the end of the tunnel:

"MemorialCare instituted a policy for physicians’ groups that provide doctors to treat patients in its hospitals: make sure those doctors are in the same insurance networks as the hospitals."

#GreatStart

[Hat Tip: FoIB tsrblke]

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2WCLrHR

Anthem & CV-19

As noted yesterday, Medical Mutual of Oho seems to be the first (and thus far only) carrier to address the question of group plans and continued eligibility:

"If one person remains employed by the company and covered by the plan, e.g. the owner or a management employee, the company can continue to cover laid-off employees as long as premium is paid."

We did receive an email from UHC announcing a conference cll on the current situation, but thus far have received no written guidelines.

And Anthem just sent this:

"As our communities work through these challenging and uncertain times, our commitment to our customers and the health and safety of our communities remains our focus."

They went on to identify all the processes they've put in place regarding social distancing and the like, but nary a word on what employees (and employees) mare supposed to be doing if their company is (temporarily) shuttered.

It seems to me that these carriers have had sufficient time to craft and disseminate a policy on this, and I'm keenly disappointed that only one has seen fit to do so.

Again, we'll keep updating as appropriate.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/33uqP5Z

Telehealth Update

As more folks (and providers) turn to telemedicine as an alternative health care delivery option, especially now due to CV-19, the issue of patient privacy comes up:

"HHS ... will exercise enforcement discretion and waive penalties for HIPAA violations against health care providers that serve patients in good faith through everyday communications technologies, such as FaceTime or Skype, during the COVID-19 emergency." https://t.co/ODkfMA9Smk

— AssocAmerPhys&Surg (@AAPSonline) March 17, 2020

I reached out to co-blogger Kelley for conformation and she responded:

"The tweet is correct, here is the information."

She also graciously attached an email from the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA), which says (in part):

"Today, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued guidance on Secretary Azar’s waiver authority that broadens access to Medicare telehealth services ... CMS will:

• Waive geographic restrictions, meaning patients can receive telehealth services in non-rural areas;

• Waive originating site restrictions, meaning patients can receive telehealth services in their home;

• Allow use of telephones that have audio and video capabilities"

And more. Click here for the full report.

And wash your hands:

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3b5NmID

Now what? CV-19 vs Group Health Insurance

Co-blogger Patrick has, perhaps, the quintessential COVID-19 tweet, at least as it applies to group health insurance:

A bigger fear than paying for COVID-19 testing and treatment is how do small businesses & people being laid off pay premiums for health insurance? @insureblog @MikeBertaut

— Patrick Paule (@patpaule) March 17, 2020

That is, if companies are (temporarily?) shuttered, what happens to their group plans?

And, of course, there's the question of folks with individual policies, as well, but that's a bigger can of worms.

As it is, there are a number of issues here, and answers will also depend on whether a given plan is fully or self-insured.

One of my small groups provides vending and games machines to bars, so our Governor's order closing all of those has left his company shuttered. He called to ask if he laid off all his employees (including himself), could he keep the group plan in place, and even pay the premiums for his employees?

For now, the only carrier that has given me specific, actionable guidance has been Medical Mutual of Ohio, but I'm certain that other carriers will offer the same options. For example:

"Q. My plan is fully insured. If I have to lay off my entire workforce in response to the COVID-19 crisis, can the company continue to cover those employees?

A. If one person remains employed by the company and covered by the plan, e.g. the owner or a management employee, the company can continue to cover laid-off employees as long as premium is paid. Please note that you must offer this coverage on a uniform, non-discriminatory basis. In other words, you may not choose only certain people for whom you continue to pay premium."

Typically, carriers require a minimum group size (usually at least one or two, sometimes three, employees); this sees to indicate that this requirement may be waived for the nonce. That would certainly make sense.

He also asked me what his options were if he just canceled the group for now, and we discussed some of those (generally about Short Term Medical plans, for now).

I'm going to update this post as more carriers weigh in.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2IYnClr

Safety Uber Alles

Depending on the carrier, one's age and the face amount at (potential) risk, many life insurance applicants muSt undergo a paramedical exam (or more). This usually entails a service obtaining blood and urine specimens, taking a blood pressure reading, and the like. Given the current CV-19 situation, I wasn't surprised to receive this notice form our primary carrier:

"With the coronavirus, ExamOne has been taking precautions when performing exams for your clients.  Below is a link to their site for updates on how they are responding and implementing safeguards.  Due to the declared state of emergency requiring all non-essential businesses to close, examiners are no longer performing exams in Pennsylvania (entire state) and the San Francisco Bay area (San Francisco, San Jose, Oakland, and the surrounding counties). This is effective immediately."

And of course, that moratorium may soon extend to other states, as well.

This means that at least a few folks will gave to wait on their new policies to be underwritten.

Now, there's an interesting twist here: when one initially makes application, if one also includes a check for the first premium with that app, one is issued a "conditional binding receipt." This obligates the company during the underwriting phase, but only so far: "It provides that the applicant is covered immediately from the date of application as long as he or she passes the insurer's underwriting requirements." [emphasis in original]

One can imagine the role this little tidbit may end up playing here...

[Hat Tip: FoIB Major B]

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2TWGPKz

Medicare 101 - Math Is Hard

In 2013 Mayor Rahmbo Emanuel instituted a cost cutting measure that saved Chicago "tens of millions of dollars". And retired city workers paid the price.

Among the perks promised to older city workers — affordable health insurance in retirement.

But in 2013, then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel announced he was ending the benefit to save cash.

Retirees who started working before 1986 were hit the hardest.

They never contributed to Medicare during their employment — the city’s choice, not theirs.

As a result, many now don’t qualify for government health insurance, even at age 65.

For a single retiree, the annual cost is now more than $33,000, whereas before it cost a few thousand dollars. - WGNTV News

More than $33,000 per year . . .

But, consider this.

Medicare Part A premium $458 (2020) - Current premium for those who do not have 40 quarters of Medicare wages.

Medicare Part B premium $145 (2020)

$458 + $145 = $503 x 12 = $6,036

$33,000 - $6,036 = $26,964

Math is hard . . .

Never let a serious crisis go to waste.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2WrA0Tf

Hunh: CV-19 testing - Covered?

So-called "excepted benefit" plans, which include Short Term and Travel Medical policies, have gotten short-shrift in the CV-19 discussion, but that may be changing (for eh good). These policies, which are not ACA-compliant (NTTAWWT), may also include Coronovirus testing.

Here's why:

These plans, while exempt from federal oversight, are still generally subject to rules and reg's put forth by the individual states in which they're sold:

"In Washington state, for example, Mike Kreidler, the insurance commissioner, is requiring all health insurers in the state to cover testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19 pneumonia, without imposing preauthorization requirements, co-payment requirements or deductibles, at least until May ."

In other words: "free."

GeoBlue, for instance, which offers ravel medical plans, "has announced that it will cover medically necessary, prescribed SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing at no cost to  the enrollee."

As has National General on their Short Term Medical plans.

And other carriers are also stepping up.

Kudos!

Now we just have to wait for the tests to be (more?) widely available.

Also: Wash your hands!

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3d3j4bf

From the P&C Files: CV-19 Exclusions

The other day, we learned that Business Interruption coverage is unlikely to extend to business that (temporarily) close their doors while the pandemic plays out. Turns out, there's likely a few more lines of coverage that will likely exclude CV-1-related claims.

Our good friend (and P&C guru) Bill M tips us to this item:

"U.S. P&C insurers face 'limited exposures' from coronavirus"

"While the virus will undoubtedly impact the health and life insurance markets, the U.S. property & casualty (P&C) sector may emerge relatively unscathed once the pandemic subsides."

Okay, I'll bite: why is that?

Well, it comes back to something we've seen before:

"Bill taught me a new phrase, and suggested I use it whenever I'm looking at these kinds of (potential) claims: "cause of loss." That is, which circumstances are specifically covered, and which are specifically excluded."

And here's where that phrase comes into play, CV-19-wise:

"However, if a factory closes because of fears that an infected worker contaminated equipment, BI coverage could be triggered. “But even in this case,” Fitch says, “claim exposures would likely be limited by policy sub-limits.”

This is different from the situation we discussed this past Friday: in this case, there seems to be an actual physical cause; but again, even that claim will probably be limited in scope.

This would also apply, for example, to supply chain disruptions and even travel interruption plans.

We  discussed this a couple of weeks ago:

"Plans where the Cancel for Any Reason upgrade has been purchased allows travelers to decide for themselves whether to travel or cancel their trip according to the terms of the plan."

One can imagine there's been a substantial uptick in interest in those kinds of plans, but as the article notes, "the adverse impact insurers will likely face will be from a decrease in demand" as folks decide to maybe trade in a staycation for that cruise (at least for the nonce). And it doesn't have to be international travel, either:

A colleague told me the other day about a friend of his who had tickets for the A-10 (?) basketball tourney in New York. He cabbed from the airport to his hotel, checked in, and learned that the event ha been canceled. Okay, disappointing, but we'll just take in a show, right?

Ummm:

"Broadway Shuts Down: Performances Canceled Through April 12 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic"

/sigh

Now, one area where carriers may see specific exposure is event cancellation (see above). When basketball and now even golf tournaments are canceled (or postponed), there may well be valid claims, depending on what type of coverage the organizers bought (if any). For example, "if the Olympics were to be canceled, Moody’s asserts that “losses could become material for some insurers,” with industry experts estimating insurance coverage for the games to be around $2 billion."

That's a lot of gold.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/38PexGc

Business: Interrupted (COVID-19 edition)

We've blogged on the subject of Business Interruption coverage before, most recently here:

"[W]hen a business must temporarily close its doors due to damage to or destruction of business property, Business Interruption insurance coverage pays for business income lost while the property is rebuilt. This coverage is intended to help keep the company in business while recovery is underway."

In that case, it was a burned up food truck, but we've also addressed weather and even civil unrest-related cases. But what about health-related ones, specifically as they may arise from businesses deciding to (temporarily?) close their doors "out of an abundance of caution?"

Well, got this from one of my P&C gurus:

"In the event of my absence, if anyone for commercial lines calls and asks if there is any business income coverage due to their business shutting down during the Coronavirus outbreak, the answer is "No"."

And why is this?

"No direct physical loss."

Which makes sense, since the physical premises haven't actually been affected.

But what if the government mandates that your business close up (at least temporarily)?

Still outta luck.

Why?

Same reason.

The key is that the coverage is tied to the physical premises, not the business itself.

Caveat: This is true at least in Ohio; as always, consult with your own agent about your specific coverage.

[Hat Tip: FoIB Teresa S and Bill M]

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2TKMC5X

COVID-19 vs Nonna & Nanno

Shot:

"It is a fact that we will have to choose [whom to treat] ...  prioritizing younger, otherwise healthy patients over older patients or those with pre-existing conditions."

So, essentially a death sentence for Italian Bubbeh's and Zaydie's.

Chaser:

"Coronavirus patients who refuse to self-isolate face murder charges in Italy"

#EmptyThreat, no?

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3aO2cDr

HSA vs COVID-19

This is big:

"The Internal Revenue Service today advised that high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) can pay for 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)-related testing and treatment, without jeopardizing their status."https://t.co/ItIWGHrpEu

— Joe Kristan (@joebwan) March 11, 2020

Here's why:

HSA-compliant health insurance plans must include certain features (and are proscribed from including others). In general, so-called first-dollar benefits are strictly prohibited. Waiving co-pays and deductibles for CV-19 testing would seem to fall into this category, so the IRS has pro-actively gone on record waiving the potential fines:

"To facilitate the nation’s response to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) ... a health plan that otherwise satisfies the requirements to be a high deductible health plan (HDHP) ... will not fail to be an HDHP ... merely because the health plan provides health benefits associated with testing for and treatment of COVID-19 without a deductible, or with a deductible below the minimum deductible (self only or family) for an HDHP."

Sweet.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/38KKnnF

Promises Broken: TomTom edition

On the one hand, we had a pretty good experience with the TomTom folks a few years back:

"Over the next few days, I called tech support a number of times, and they could not have been more helpful, professional or courteous."

But that was then, and this is now. Via email from "Dave @ Tom" (likely not his real name):

"Hi there,

We have been trying to contact you [ED: NO, THEY HAVEN'T] about the end of product support for your TomTom XL IQR.

The last compatible map update for your TomTom XL IQR was released around 09/01/2018, which means your current map might be 26 months old, missing 9 map updates. Therefore, me and my colleagues here highly recommend to no longer use your beloved TomTom XL IQRand consider replacing your device."

[ed: 'me and my colleagues.' Ever heard of Grammarly®, Dave?]

I replied:

"So the contractual obligation that comes with Lifetime Map Updates (see attached) is meaningless?"

Why the heck would I ever consider buying another product from you?

Wow."

Naturally, that email bounced:

"Thank you for contacting TomTom Customer Care. Unfortunately we are unable to respond to any messages sent to this email address."

Because of *course* it did.

So, I've taken this public, in the hopes of helping others avoid my fate by purchasing a product with explicit features and promises that the company can arbitrarily decide to cease providing.

#CaveatEmptor

#CheatinTomTom

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/3cTPVQ2

Truth in Advertising

Got a LinkedIn invite recently from a gentleman (whose identity I've redacted) asking to be added to my network:

"Hi Henry,

I’m looking to grow my community with leaders that are interested in giving their members a better healthcare experience. If you think your members deserve more while paying less, then we should connect and chat. (Don’t worry, I’m not selling health insurance!)

Thanks,
[Redacted]"

It's that last bit that caught my eye:

"Don’t worry, I’m not selling health insurance!"

Why?

Well, because he's a regional poobah for Sedera Health.

And what is Sedera health, you ask?

Well, it's a "cost sharing community" ('community' now being the more politically correct version of 'ministry,' one supposes) to which one may subscribe. As we've noted in the past, these sharing ministries/communities/whatever are ACA-compliant, and generally much less expensive than ObamaPlans (particularly for folks who don't qualify for a subsidy or cost-sharing).

What they are not, however, and as my would-be associate notes, is insurance. That's because "Members agree to share one-another’s medical expenses through an act of voluntary giving." That's very different from a government-regulated (and enforced) insurance contract.

Which is not to absolve the carriers of their various and sundry shenanigans, oft-reported here at IB. But in those cases, thee are avenues of redress: arbitration, litigation, and even criminal prosecution.

Not so with these plans.

Does that make them evil (or carcinogenic, or fattening)?

Of course not!

But certainly food for thought if one is considering signing up.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2W1CLKu

About your LTCi plan and the Stock Market

As the stock market continues its roller coaster ride, this seems like a good time to remind folks about the folly of self-insuring Long Term Care expenses:

Even though her #investments are down about 20%, my mother-in-law's #longtermcare insurance policy will pay the full cost of her assisted-living facility this month just like it did last month. #bearmarket #personalfinance #RetirementPlanning

Thank you, @johnhancockusa! https://t.co/aVzSy4Nit2

— Scott A. Olson, CLTC (@LTCShop) March 10, 2020

That is, regardless of how the market does (or doesn't do), once you're on-claim, you're on-claim for the duration of your policy's benefit period.

 

On the other hand, if you've chosen to self-insure, that certainty becomes a lot less ... certain.

Just sayin'.

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2v9bZ80

Laundry time (Again)

So, another two years has rolled by, and it's time to re-certify for Anti-Money Laundering. This entails a brief, but silly, online course about the perils and pitfalls, Red Flags and Due Diligence as a result of the USA Patriot Act and our government's concern about money laundering and identity theft.

Or, as a good friend puts it, a very helpful "How To" guide on the subject.

Last time out, I remarked on the apparent xenophobia suffered by the good folks who wrote the course.

This time, it's a different (but oh so timely!) political cynicism:"

"Enhanced Due Diligence

A client’s location, affiliation, or type of business may raise red flags that indicate a need for increased scrutiny. For example, regulators have identified senior political figures as individuals that require greater due diligence. This enhanced due diligence will be conducted by the carrier."

Heh.

[Emphasis added]

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2vKS5Ri

CMMS vs COVID-19

Via email from CMMS:

"[This past Friday], the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) took additional actions to ensure America’s patients, healthcare facilities and clinical laboratories are prepared to respond to the 2019-Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19).

CMS has developed a second Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code that can be used by laboratories to bill for certain COVID-19 diagnostic tests to help increase testing and track new cases. In addition, CMS released new fact sheets that explain Medicare, Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program, and Individual and Small Group Market Private Insurance coverage for services to help patients prepare as well."

This seems especially crucial given the increased risk favors faced by those on Medicare (seasoned citizens).

The agency also released 3 helpful publications:

■ Medicare Fact Sheet Highlights

■ Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Fact Sheet Highlights

■ Individual and Small Group Market Insurance Coverage

#Kudos!

[The entire press release is also available here]

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2VWgnSX

Chilling, but #TruthWillOut

We generally don't do partisan politics here at IB, but this particular example of (inadvertent?) truth-telling is important:

Biden tells crowd he wants to increase premiums and make sure that healthcare is 'not quality, but only affordable'... pic.twitter.com/fNhtcW7kxx

— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) March 6, 2020

"[W]e’ll make sure it’s not quality, but only affordable”

And that, in a nutshell, is the whole premise of a "Public Option" (or any "universal care" scheme, really).

But what, exactly, is the problem with a Public Option?

"The "Public Option" is a euphemism for Single Payer, the obvious end-game for the ObamaTax from the get-go. And how do we know this?"The [Obama] administration still intends to control medical costs by ... a single payer mechanism"

And there you have it: full circle.

#Medicaid4All

[Hat Tip: Mr Jones]

Original content copyright © InsureBlog

from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2VPbA5x